Detecting and Evaluating Coagulation Inhibitors and Factor Deficiencies
Continuing Education Credits
Objectives
- Determine various causes of an elevated prothrombin time or activated partial thromboplastin time result.
- Evaluate situations in which performing a mixing study would be appropriate.
- List the steps involved in a prothrombin time or activated partial thromboplastin time mixing study procedure.
- Analyze and interpret mixing study results to distinguish a factor deficiency from a circulating inhibitor.
- Determine which, if any, further coagulation studies would prove helpful after obtaining mixing study results.
Course Outline
- Introduction to Coagulation Inhibitors and Factor Deficiencies
- Introduction to Coagulation Inhibitors
- Coagulation Inhibitors
- Introduction to Factor Deficiencies
- Coagulation Inhibitors and Coagulation Screening Tests
- Evaluating Prolonged Test Results
- Coagulation Factors Monitored by the Prothrombin Time Test
- Coagulation Factors Involved in the Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Test
- Elevations in PT or aPTT Assays
- Pre-examination Variables Causing Falsely Elevated Results
- Summary of Initial Elevations in the PT and aPTT
- Which of the following may produce a falsely prolonged aPTT test result?
- True or False: Performing a thrombin time to detect heparin contamination in a patient's plasma is done to avoid performing mixing studies for aPTTs that would result in a false positive result.
- Performing a Mixing Study
- Introduction to Mixing Studies
- When to Perform a Mixing Study
- Mixing studies may help to determine the presence of which of the following?
- Mixing Study Test Principle
- Mixing Study Specimen Requirements
- Performance of a Mixing Study
- Performance of a Mixing Study, continued
- Performance of a Mixing Study, continued
- What is the ratio of patient plasma to pooled normal plasma that is usually used in the performance of a mixing study?
- What is the minimum percentage of each coagulation factor that must be present in a patient's plasma to produce a normal PT and aPTT test result?
- Analyzing and Interpreting Mixing Study Results
- Analyzing the Mixing Study Results
- Interpreting the Mixing Study Results
- Are the patient's mixing study results corrected or not corrected? Would this support the presence of a factor deficiency or coagulation inhibitor?Initial PTImmediate Mixing Study PTIncubated Mixing Study PT23 sec. 12 sec. 13 sec.
- Analyzing the Mixing Study Results, continued
- Analyzing the Mixing Study Results, continued
- Mixing Study Methodology Differences
- Case Study One
- Case Study One
- Case Study One, continued
- After reviewing the mixing study results, what is the most likely determination?
- Which factor level could be deficient?
- Case Study Two
- Case Study Two
- After reviewing the mixing study results, is the aPTT corrected or not corrected? Does this support the presence of a factor deficiency or coagulation inhibitor?
- Case Study Three
- Case Study Three
- Has the mixing study corrected the aPTT? Is a factor deficiency or a coagulation inhibitor the likely cause of the patient's prolonged aPTT?
- Determination of Further Coagulation Studies
- Further Analyses for Factor Deficiencies
- Further Analyses for Factor Deficiencies, continued
- Factor Activity Curves
- Treatment for Factor Deficiencies
- Lupus Anticoagulant
- Lupus Anticoagulant, continued
- Further Analyses for Coagulation Inhibitors
- Treatment for Coagulation Inhibitors
- Which of the following tests is used to quantify a coagulation inhibitor?
- References
- References
